exit

Ecology and Environment   > Home   > Journal

Urban Risks

Risques urbains




URiS - ISSN 2516-1857 - © ISTE Ltd

Aims and scope

Objectifs de la revue

Urban Risks sets major frameworks of risk analysis reflection related to a particular type of threat or vulnerability while learning from other experiences necessary for understanding the complexity of the urban operation.

 

This multidisciplinary approach allows authors to submit articles from the point of view of malfunctions due to the fragility and interdependence of technical systems, responses and impacts of human, material, social or financial exposure to climate, industrial, terrorist or natural hazards, or from the point of view of the concepts of vulnerability, resilience and efficiency, modeling, methods on spatial and temporal approaches, assessment, data and representation tools.

 

Scientific Board (under construction)

Damien SERRE (direction)
CEARC, Université Paris Saclay - UVSQ

 

Maria Fabrizia CLEMENTE
Université de Naples Federico II
mariafabrizia.clemente@unina.it

 

Julia FROTEY
Institut national de la recherche scientifique
Julia.Frotey@inrs.ca

 

Charlotte HEINZLEF
Université de Versailles
Saint Quentin en Yvelines
charlotte.heinzlef@uvsq.fr

 

Laurent LESCOP
ENSA Nantes
laurent.lescop@nantes.archi

 

Jeffrey RAVEN
New York Institute of Technology
jraven@nyit.edu

 

Christine VOIRON
Université de Nice
christine.voiron@unice.fr

Risques urbains pose les grands cadres de réflexion d’analyse des risques liés à un type particulier de menace ou de vulnérabilité tout en s’enrichissant d’autres expériences nécessaires à la compréhension de la complexité du fonctionnement urbain.

 

Cette multidisciplinarité permet aux auteurs de présenter des articles sous l’angle des dysfonctionnements dus à la fragilité et aux interdépendances des systèmes techniques, des réponses et des impacts humains, matériels, sociaux ou financiers, de l’exposition à des aléas naturels, climatiques, industriels, terroristes, ou sous l’angle des concepts de vulnérabilité, de résilience et d’efficience, de modélisation, des méthodes, d’approches spatiales et temporelles, des outils d’évaluation, des données et des représentations.

 

Processus de sélection des articles et d’évaluations par des pairs.

Le processus se déroule en 4 étapes avec des délais courts afin que la décision finale soit rendue dans un délai de 3 mois :

1. A réception des articles les rédacteurs en chef établissent une première sélection afin d’éliminer les articles dont la qualité ou le contenu semblent loin des objectifs de la revue. Un accusé de réception est alors envoyé à l’auteur.

2. Dans le cas d’une acceptation de l’étape 1, les articles sont soumis au comité éditorial (ou aux rédacteurs associés dans le cadre d’un numéro spécial ou d’un dossier thématique). Un membre du comité éditorial (appelé l’éditeur) se charge de piloter la procédure d’évaluation par des pairs (2 évaluateurs externes minimums).

3. A la réception des rapports d’évaluation l’éditeur et les rédacteurs en chef décident de la suite à donner à l’article (Acceptation, Publication après corrections, Refus). En cas de contradiction entre les deux rapports des évaluateurs externes, l’article sera soumis à un membre du comité de rédaction pour une évaluation complémentaire avant décision.

4. Un courriel est envoyé à l’auteur afin de lui signifier le résultat de l’évaluation. La décision est sans appel. En cas de « Publication après corrections » l’auteur a un délai court (2 à 4 semaines selon les cas) pour procéder aux corrections. La version modifiée (accompagnée d’une lettre précisant la prise en compte par les auteurs des demandes formulées) est alors transmise à l’éditeur qui vérifie la pertinence des modifications. Si les corrections ne paraissent pas satisfaisantes, le comité de rédaction est consulté et peut refuser la publication de l’article.

 

Conseil scientifique (en construction)

Damien SERRE (direction)
CEARC, Université Paris Saclay - UVSQ

 

Maria Fabrizia CLEMENTE
Université de Naples Federico II
mariafabrizia.clemente@unina.it

 

Julia FROTEY
Institut national de la recherche scientifique
Julia.Frotey@inrs.ca

 

Charlotte HEINZLEF
Université de Versailles
Saint Quentin en Yvelines
charlotte.heinzlef@uvsq.fr

 

Laurent LESCOP
ENSA Nantes
laurent.lescop@nantes.archi

 

Jeffrey RAVEN
New York Institute of Technology
jraven@nyit.edu

 

Christine VOIRON
Université de Nice
christine.voiron@unice.fr

Journal issues

2024

Volume 24- 8

Issue 1

2023

Volume 23- 7

Issue 1

2022

Volume 22- 6

Issue 1

2021

Volume 21- 5

Issue 1

2020

Volume 20- 4

Issue 1

2019

Volume 19- 3

Issue 1

2018

Volume 18- 2

Issue 1

2017

Volume 17- 1

Issue 1

Recent articles

Are today topographic data suitable for urban climate study?
Anne Ruas, Florence Jacquinod, Zohra Mhedhbi, Florian Betou

Climate change is shaking up research agendas and urban planning priorities. A number of events, including floods and heatwaves, are disrupting metropolitan areas. Urban redevelopment to meet these challenges is costly and takes time. Numerical simulation is a great tool for studying urban development scenarios and the effectiveness of development solutions. Numerical models of the urban climate exist and are gradually being improved by the scientific community. These models are parameterised, among other things, by geographical data describing mineral surfaces (buildings, asphalt floors), non-mineral surfaces (water surfaces, herbaceous soils, bare permeable soils) and tree canopies. In this article we study the suitability of existing topographic data for parameterising climate models. We begin by recalling the importance of database specifications for understanding the gap between the real world and the content of databases. We then describe strategies for constructing land cover data suitable for studying the urban climate using national reference systems and in the absence of such data. Finally, we consider the potential contribution of very large-scale data, such as BIM, to the study of urban climates. In conclusion, we propose an improvement in the specifications of national geodatabases to better meet the needs of urban planning in the context of climate change.


Geoclimatic modeling: tools, limits and outlooks
Jérémy Bernard, Thomas Leduc, Auline Rodler, Alexandre Merville, Hiba Hamdi

Today, urban climate diagnostic tools can be useful to local authorities and cities: they provide input for urban planning and development project design at different spatial scales, in a context of mitigating both global climate change and local climate heat peaks. In the following paper, we identify and list diagnostic tools, and mainly focus on geoclimatic ones. The latter have the particularity of requiring geomatics and geographic data to provide useful outputs for diagnosing overheating in cities. A classification of these tools is presented, based on four criteria. The first criteria is based on how the urban fabric is considered by each of the tools: simplified or detailed. The second criteria is the type of output produced by the software: it contains physical quantities or qualitative information (e.g. shadow or sunlit). The third criteria is relative to the choice of the problem-solving approach: physical vs statistical? The last criteria is what type of physics the software tool addresses (air temperature, wind, radiation, etc.). Finally, tools are sorted according to this classification and their relation to geomatics further described. It emerges that each tool has been developed for a particular need and from a specific point of view. This point of view will also help to explain the strengths, weaknesses and simplifications of each tool. Lastly, it highlights areas where software development, or even model development, require the attention of the GIS sci-ences.


Measurement and spatialization of climate and air quality data in urban environments in France
Sarah Duché, Vincent Dubreuil, Malika Madelin, Vincent Dupuis, Xavier Foissard, Yann Gripay, Sandra Rome, Sylvie Servigne

The urban heat island and urban air pollution, major health risks in cities, can be measured by networks of fixed stations or mobile measurements in urban environments. Protocols have been set up to ensure that climate and air pollution issues are representative at different spatial and temporal scales. The aim of this article is to present the existing measurement networks, the protocols implemented in French research, and the spatial representations of the data derived from these measurements. This overview provides an insight into the scientific and technical issues involved in setting up climate and air pollution measurements.


Understanding the notion of risk and its various forms in geography
Anthony Tchékémian

From the early stages of industrialization in Europe, America or Japan, the living standards of populations have drastically improved thanks to explorations, the use of coal, steel, as well as of nuclear or nanotechnologies, although such progress is increasingly called into question. However, would these improvements have been possible had their initiators been aware of the human and environmental consequences right from the beginning? Nowadays, companies boasting ecological values attempt to limit the consequences of risks by regulating or even prohibiting any action deemed dangerous, as illustrated by the "precautionary principle". In this context, this paper offers a reflection on the importance given to geography when it comes to dealing with the notion of risk and accepting it, arguing for a transdisciplinary approach, thus integrating perceptions and representations of the risk concept into the study of territories.


Are cities resilient?
Sander E. van der Leeuw

This paper first argues that the driving force behind the aggregation of human settlement, throughout the centuries, has been the ever-increasing need for collective problem solving. Villages and cities have emerged in ‘dissipative flow structures’ in which organization (information processing capacity) spread out from cities into their hinterland, enabing energy and other resources to increasingly flow into cities to meet the needs of the population. Information processing is thus the driver of urbanization, and energy is the constraint. With the Industrial Revolution, the growth of such dissipative flow structures accelerated very rapidly due to the fact that fossil energy became available and lifted the constraint. Hence the urban explosion of the last couple of centuries. In the second part of the paper, some of the potential consequences of this explosion are discussed. First, whether the ever accelerating increase of global urbanization will continue or not, and then what might be the consequences of that acceleration for urban planning and architecture, emphasizing that cities need to become pro-active rather than re-active. They need to start designing for change rather than responding to it. In a final section we discuss some of the risks to urbanization that are posed by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Revolution, and conclude with a suggestion how, in developed countries, information technology might reverse the trend to increasing concentration of the population in cities, whereas for the moment, this is not likely to be the case in developing countries.


From the reading of a crisis to that of territorial resilience: the 2017 El Niño in Peru, seen from the capital.
Maxime Delaitre, Alexis Sierra, Bruno Barroca, Jorge Vargas Florez

At the beginning of 2017, the Peruvian territory has witnessed several severe rains which were amplified by El Niño phenomenon, particularly affecting the coast of the country. Under these circumstances, multiple emergency declarations were issued putting the National System of Risk Management of Disasters, reformed in 2011, to the test of the huaycos, the indigenous Quechua word for flash floods landslide, which stroke the Andean country in January 2017. In light of a major event and the encountered difficulties, the Peruvian State adapts and centralizes the answer to the urgency. This article offers a first reading of the management of the national crisis through its effects in Lima and Callao’s metropolitan area as established centres for the emergency operations and the deployment of the humanitarian activities. Including interviews carried out with members of the central government, the fieldwork and the documentation available at the time of the urgency. The aim of this article is the exposition of the components of territorial resilience then concerned in a context of national crisis, questioning, inter alia, the mobilized resources and the context of their use.


Management of multiples risks in urban areas: An integrated multi‐risks analysis model for a general resilience
Nabil Touili

A territory is never facing one hazard but a set of interacting hazards. In a same space, floods, heatwaves/cold-waves or earthquakes usually coexist with industrial activities as energy plants, chemical factories or hazardous materials transportation. Thus, the risk management is still focused on single-hazard approaches at the expense of global, more systemic, ones which integrate the multiple hazards and the associated risks’ interactions on a same territory. This paper put forward an integrated model for multi-risks analysis to enhance a general resilience in urban territories.


Anticipating and simulating the change dynamics to diagnose and improve the resilience of an urban territorial system
Christine Voiron-Canicio, Jérôme Dutozia

This contribution deals with resilient cities and explicitly takes an overall perspective. The concept of
resilience is here used to examine both the event-type perturbations, which process in a relatively short time frame, and the anticipation of urban futures and territorial change dynamics, which process in a long term frame. We propose a practical exemplary of dominos effects spatialization diagnosis during flood and electric power failure in Marseille. Then, resilience of cities is linked with territorial development issues, anticipation of possible tensions and unsafe situations that may emerge due to land planning strategy, water shortages management or innovation diffusion.

Editorial Board

 

Editor in Chief

 

Bruno BARROCA
Lab’Urba – Université Gustave Eiffel
bruno.barroca@univ-eiffel.fr

 

Co-Editors

 

Vincent BECUE
Université de Mons
Belgique
Vincent.BECUE@umons.ac.be

 

Mattia LEONE
Université de Naples Federico II
Italie
mattia.leone@unina.it

 

Isabelle THOMAS
Université de Montréal
Canada
isabelle.thomas.1@umontreal.ca

 

Nada TOUEIR
Lincoln University
Nouvelle-Zélande
nada.toueir@lincoln.ac.nz


  Submit a paper