exit

Engineering and Systems   > Home   > Journal

Related domain(s) : Social Sciences and Humanities  

Technology and Innovation

Technologie et innovation




TechInn - ISSN 2399-8571 - © ISTE Ltd

Aims and scope

Objectifs de la revue

Technology and Innovation is multidisciplinary journal. Its objectives are : to analyze systems and scientific and technical paradigms ; study their innovation paths ; discuss the connections of technology to society but also to innovation, examine how innovation disrupts the functioning of organizations and companies nowadays and in the industrial past, study stakeholder strategies (enterprises, laboratories, public institutions, users) in the production, use and diffusion of new technologies, understand the systemics of these technologies and construct scenarios of their potential diffusion and application ; understand how innovation questions our categories of thought and upsets traditional knowledge mapping…and the meaning of innovation.

 

The journal welcomes articles from the following backgrounds : economy, management, history, epistemology and philosophy of techniques and innovation and design engineering.

 

Scientific Board

Laure MOREL (direction)
Université de Lorraine, Laboratoire ERPI
laure.morel@univ-lorraine.fr

 

Smaïl AÏT-EL-HADJ
Institut Textile et Chimique
Université de Lyon
smail.aitelhadj@itech.fr

 

Angelo BONOMI
CNR-IRCrES, Italie
abonomi@bluewin.ch

 

Sophie BOUTILLIER
Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale
Sophie.Boutillier@univ-littoral.fr

 

Pierre BARBAROUX
Centre de recherche de l’armée de l’air
pierre.barbaroux@ecole-air.fr

 

Romain DEBREF
Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne
romain.debref@univ-reims.fr

 

Camille DUMAT
Université de Toulouse INP-ENSAT
Lab. DYNAFOR INRAE-INP
camille.dumat@ensat.fr

 

Joelle FOREST
INSA de Lyon
joelle.forest@insa-lyon.fr

 

 

Sophie FOURMENTIN
UCEIV, Université Littoral Cote d’Opale
sophie.fourmentin@univ-littoral.fr

 

Nathalie JULLIAN
Université Picardie Jules Verne
Nathalie.pawlicki@u-picardie.fr

 

Pierre LAMARD
Université de Technologie
de Belfort-Montbéliard
pierre.lamard@utbm.fr

 

Didier LEBERT
ENSTA Paris
didier.lebert@ensta-paris.fr

 

Sophie REBOUD
Groupe ESC Dijon-Bourgogne
sophie.reboud@escdijon.eu

 

Jean-Claude RUANO-BORBALAN
Conservatoire national des arts et métiers
jean-claude.ruano_borbalan@cnam.fr

 

Jean-Marc TOUZARD
INRA
jean-marc.touzard@supagro.inra.fr

 

Konstantinos P. TSAGARAKIS
Technical University of Crete, Greece
ktsagarakis@tuc.gr

 

Technologie et innovation est une revue pluridisciplinaire. Ses objectifs sont les suivants : analyser les systèmes et les paradigmes scientifiques et techniques, étudier leurs trajectoires d’évolution, discuter des liens de la Technologie à la société mais aussi de la Technologie à l’innovation, examiner comment les innovations bouleversent le fonctionnement des organisations et des sociétés aujourd’hui et dans le passé industriel, étudier les stratégies des acteurs (entreprises, laboratoires, institutions publiques, usagers) de production, d’utilisation, de diffusion des nouvelles technologies, comprendre la systémique de ces technologies et construire de scenarii sur leur potentiel de diffusion et d’application, étudier comment les innovations questionnent nos catégories de pensée et bousculent la cartographie traditionnelle des savoirs... penser le sens de l’innovation.

Elle accueille des articles en économie, gestion, histoire, sciences de l’information et de la communication, épistémologie et philosophie des techniques, ingénierie de l’innovation et design.

 

Conseil scientifique

Laure MOREL (direction)
Université de Lorraine, Laboratoire ERPI
laure.morel@univ-lorraine.fr

 

Smaïl AÏT-EL-HADJ
Institut Textile et Chimique
Université de Lyon
smail.aitelhadj@itech.fr

 

Angelo BONOMI
CNR-IRCrES, Italie
abonomi@bluewin.ch

 

Sophie BOUTILLIER
Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale
Sophie.Boutillier@univ-littoral.fr

 

Pierre BARBAROUX
Centre de recherche de l’armée de l’air
pierre.barbaroux@ecole-air.fr

 

Romain DEBREF
Université de Reims Champagne Ardenne
romain.debref@univ-reims.fr

 

Camille DUMAT
Université de Toulouse INP-ENSAT
Lab. DYNAFOR INRAE-INP
camille.dumat@ensat.fr

 

Joelle FOREST
INSA de Lyon
joelle.forest@insa-lyon.fr

 

 

Sophie FOURMENTIN
UCEIV, Université Littoral Cote d’Opale
sophie.fourmentin@univ-littoral.fr

 

Nathalie JULLIAN
Université Picardie Jules Verne
Nathalie.pawlicki@u-picardie.fr

 

Pierre LAMARD
Université de Technologie
de Belfort-Montbéliard
pierre.lamard@utbm.fr

 

Didier LEBERT
ENSTA Paris
didier.lebert@ensta-paris.fr

 

Sophie REBOUD
Groupe ESC Dijon-Bourgogne
sophie.reboud@escdijon.eu

 

Jean-Claude RUANO-BORBALAN
Conservatoire national des arts et métiers
jean-claude.ruano_borbalan@cnam.fr

 

Jean-Marc TOUZARD
INRA
jean-marc.touzard@supagro.inra.fr

 

Konstantinos P. TSAGARAKIS
Technical University of Crete, Greece
ktsagarakis@tuc.gr

 

Forthcoming issues

Forthcoming papers

Journal issues


Recent articles

Qualificative Artificial Intelligence (QuAI): When artificial intelligence integrates all the diversity of human critical thinking
Florin Paun, Ingrid Vaileanu, Thomas O’neal, Laurent Chaudron

In the light of the contributions of the logics of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and disruptive innovations [ADA, 18] and research issues on solutions for participatory qualification of impact data recalling older questions and analyzes including the Condorcet paradox [CON 85] and the incompleteness theorem of Arrow [ARR 51] or of Nobel Prize winner Amartya Sen [SEN 70] on the evolution of economic models towards an economy of well-being with collective choice we propose possible responses for co-construction of new highly collaborative open qualification tools and processes [PAU 12]. By taking into account the diversity of open innovation actors to integrate the capabilities augmented by AI, we manage to integrate ex ante into highly democratic processes and AI tools the diversity of evolving determinants of opinions on the perceived impacts on everything. topics of common interest expressed. This leads our research towards the discovery [PAU 22] of a third typology of AI in addition to the symbolic one and the connective one: the Qualificative Artificial Intelligence (QuAI) - with the ability to integrate human critical thinking. New spaces – QuAI tools, collaborative open qualification processes – can thus lead to optimal choices through collaboration and the collective creation of relevance and trust, particularly through new dynamic capabilities that potentially create disruptive innovations. Several usage functionalities are identified in terms of developments towards a functionality economy [VAI, 20]. and the democratization of access and contribution to impact data aimed at disruptive innovative solutions and tools for resilience [SCH 22] considering the multifaceted (economic, climate change, confidence) crises [PAU 09, 12, 18].


Digital Technologies and Information Inflation: A DICS Perspective
Jean-Louis Monino

The strategic importance of information in a country’s competitiveness and business management. In the knowledge society, economic information, which differs from other goods, is crucial to competitive advantage. Companies that access relevant information (market, legal, technological, etc.) before others can make more informed strategic decisions. With the massive increase in available data, business intelligence becomes essential for filtering and organizing this information. Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into business processes requires a methodical approach, including the development of customized AI solutions, their integration with existing systems, and their use to improve or create innovative services that enhance the customer experience.


Wargaming, a serious war game practice, simulation and digital technology opportunities
Stéphane Goria

The professional or semi-professional practice of wargames is called wargaming. It encompasses numerous forms of war simulation that share the commonality of being serious games based on data derived from the field and/or aimed at collecting new data. Their use can be educational, preparatory for planification, exploratory, or prospective. Wargame can be played in a physical or computerized format, or even in a hybrid form combining these alternatives. Drawing on a literature review on this subject, this article aims to shed light on the different categories of wargames practiced by the military, as well as the advantages, disadvantages, and risks of physical wargames compared to digital ones.


The French army’s Red Team program, a bet on the dysperformativity of science fiction
Thomas Michaud

The French army’s Red Team program consists of creating science fiction stories with the aim of anticipating conflicts that could threaten the territory by 2030-2060. Part of the trend of institutional science fiction, it is based on the capacity to arouse the cognitive strangeness dear to Darko Suvin and to create novum (imaginary technologies) vectors of difficulties, but also of solutions in the wars of the future. If certain novum have a performative function, the diegesis, that is to say the spatiotemporal environment of the story, takes on more of a dysperformative dimension. These stories seek to arouse the reaction of soldiers to imaginary dangers so that they implement strategies in advance to avoid their occurrence. Science fiction authors capture the unconscious of organizations and reveal their prophetic imaginaries. Innovism is also a true ideology pragmatically using the imaginary to question the established order and generate new ideas that are sources of creative destruction. The Red Team also brings the French army into a regime of historicity oriented towards the future, more than towards the battles of the past. Science fiction is also a paradoxical genre, involving a specific interpretation of reality and the future. It is therefore appropriate to question the advantages and possible disadvantages linked to the use of a paradoxical vision of the future in the development of an organization’s strategies aimed above all at efficiency and pragmatism.


Remote working and innovation: The trust needed to invent new ways of working together?
Sandrine Virgili, Frédéric Bornarel, Hélène Delacour

Recent pandemics have forced most companies to experiment with remote working to varying degrees. Despite the exceptional productivity of employees in this crisis context and the desire of employees to continue working remotely, the most innovative companies are making a strong case for more face-to-face work. This movement, called ”return to the office" is seen as the only way to create effective collaboration in innovative teams. In this paper, we show that the „return to the office‟ argument is based on a narrow conception of face-to-face trust or affect-based trust, as the main driver of collaborative dynamics. On the contrary, drawing on trust and innovation management research, we emphasize that distance does not limit the production of effective trust for innovative teams. Moreover, we propose a new articulation between two forms of trust, swift trust and reflective trust, i.e., the “swift reflective trust”, to support a new hybrid way of working that fosters collaboration and innovation.


[FORTHCOMING] Non-pharmacological interventions (NPI): From research to health practice
Grégory Ninot

This article presents the definition of personalized and targeted prevention and care protocols based on science, non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs), proposed by an international multidisciplinary scientific society, the Non-Pharmacological Intervention Society. It defines the scope of these health practices based on a standardized ethical and scientific evaluation framework developed over two years with more than 1000 people. Since 2024, this framework has enabled the creation of a universal heritage of intangible prevention and care protocols in a digital library, the NPIS Registry.


[FORTHCOMING] Mindfulness as a non-pharmacological intervention: the challenges for the health sector
Anne-Laure Fraga

Mindfulness as a non-pharmacological intervention complements conventional medicine in the field of integrative health, as it is both a treatment protocol and a prevention protocol. It allows us to look at the person as a whole and no longer just as a patient suffering only from their disease. Many healthcare facilities are now using it in supportive care, chronic illness and pain, and because of its impact on the efficiency of organizations and the importance placed on care. In recent years, mindfulness has also been integrated into training courses for leadership development in organizations. Its use in the healthcare sector is therefore an important topic, and this article describes the expected impact of these measures.


[FORTHCOMING] Integrated management of childhood illnesses as a non-drug preventive intervention introduced within health structures in Gabon
Amélie Blanche NGOMBO LEPOPA

In Gabon, infant mortality is of the utmost importance for children’s health. The mortality rate has fluctuated over the years between 32.90 % in 2020 and 48 % in 2021. The most common causes of death are respiratory infections, gastrointestinal infections, skin and parasite infections, malnutrition and eye and ear infections. The strategy to regulate this situation consists of a series of measures for comprehensive and integrated care to support breastfeeding mothers as their babies grow. This article shows how gradual support for mothers to feed their babies from birth to six months of age at the health center can be considered a preventive, non-drug intervention. Participant observations were conducted in three health facilities: the maternal and child health center in Awendjié, Nzeng-Ayong and La Peyrie.


[FORTHCOMING] Use of non-drug therapies in Malaysia: Pluralism versus integration of traditional and complementary medicines
Brigitte Sébastia

Malaysia has a wide variety of traditional medicines stemming from its rich ethnic heritage, which have gradually been joined by more or less globalized complementary medicines. The practice of these medicines, which largely consist of manual therapies, is important to investigate their function as substitutes for drug interventions. This article addresses this issue by showing that the therapeutic model proposed by the Malaysian Holistic and Herbal Organization is based on a subtle combination of non-drug practices from T&C medicine, taking into account the various aspects of the disease and the patient, and promoting demedicalization. Conversely, the integrative model developed by the government, which is too reductive in its form, can only partially compensate for the strong medicalization inherent in biomedicine.


[FORTHCOMING] Changing the vision of disability: hyperpersonalization in the service of healing in the orthopedic context. A new field in non-drug strategies
Marion Daparo

The action of “taking care” is one of the oldest gestures made towards others. Beyond health and well-being, it is appropriate to broaden the scope of these practices to the various dimensions of care with the very idea of understanding, in its unities and diversities, a variation of situations passing from acts the most. Punctual to the broadest ethical, political and prospective issues. Thus the implementation of non-medication care strategies allows us to question and wonder how the knowledge and practices of “taking care” can be re-examined in a multicultural world. To do this, it is a question of studying the conditions for applying these strategies so that they become key skills for a more sustainable and united world.

Editorial Board

Editor

Dimitri UZUNIDIS
Research Network on Innovation, Paris
Dimitri.Uzunidis@univ-littoral.fr

 

Editors in Chief

Stéphane GORIA
Centre de recherche sur les médiations
Université de Lorraine
Stephane.goria@univ-lorraine.fr

 

Thomas MICHAUD
ISI/Laboratoire de Recherche sur l’Industrie et l’Innovation
Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale
thomachaud@yahoo.fr

 

Co-Editors

Camille AOUINAIT
Réseau de Recherche sur l’Innovation
camille.aouinait@gmail.com

Bertrand BOCQUET
Université de Lille
Bertrand.Bocquet@univ-lille.fr

Laurent DUPONT
ENSGSI-ERPI – Université de Lorraine
l.dupont@univ-lorraine.fr

Blandine LAPERCHE
Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale
Clersé
laperche@univ-littoral.fr

Cédric PERRIN
Université Évry Val d’Essonne
cp2002@orange.fr

Schallum PIERRE
Institut intelligence et données (IID)
Université de Laval
Canada
schallum.pierre@iid.ulaval.ca

Corinne TANGUY
Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté
corinne.tanguy@dijon.inra.fr

 


Charte éthique


Call for Papers :


- Design Thinking


- Ecology of ecological innovations


- Digital and and Services


  Submit a paper