@ARTICLE{TBA, 

TITLE={[FORTHCOMING] Parliamentary debates on the « climate and resilience » bill: decarbonisation: a different approach}, 
  
AUTHOR={Régis Matuszewicz, }, 
	
JOURNAL={Technology and Innovation}, 
	
VOLUME={}, 

NUMBER={Forthcoming papers}, 
	
YEAR={2024}, 

URL={https://openscience.fr/Parliamentary-debates-on-the-climate-and-resilience-bill-decarbonisation-a}, 
	
DOI={TBA}, 
	
ISSN={2399-8571}, 
	
ABSTRACT={Our study focuses on the parliamentary debates on the » climate and resilience » bill, which intends to reduce the carbon footprint. It aims to describe and analyse the various symbolic devices, the ideological references mobilised by parliamentarians, and the arguments developped in relation to the government’s for decarbonisation in the context of this bill, by focusing our study on the general discussion. The political right and the government majority structure their discourse around liberal thinking based on economic efficiency, décentralisation and the acceptability of measures. The political far right is developping a nationalist conception of ecology based on ancestral localism. On the political left, we find a conception of ecology centred on the idea of social justice, although with variable geometry. Behind the unaminity in the face of the climate emergency, there are in fact significant differences in the conceptions of decarbonisation of the different parliamentary groups.}}