TY  - Type of reference 
TI  - Human–Autonomy Teaming: Definitions, Debates, and Directions 
AU  - Joseph B. Lyons 
AU  - Katia Sycara 
AU  - Michael Lewis 
AU  - August Capiola 
AB  - Researchers are beginning to transition from studying human–automation interaction to human–autonomy teaming. This distinction has been highlighted in recent literature, and theoretical reasons why the psychological experience of humans interacting with autonomy may vary and affect subsequent collaboration outcomes are beginning to emerge. In this review, we do a deep dive into human-autonomy teams (HATs) by explaining the differences between automation and autonomy and by reviewing the domain of human–human teaming to make inferences for HATs. We examine the domain of human–human teaming to extrapolate a few core factors that could have relevance for HATs. Notably, these factors involve critical social elements within teams that are central (as argued in this review) for HATs. We conclude by highlighting some research gaps that researchers should strive toward answering, which will ultimately facilitate a more nuanced and complete understanding of HATs in a variety of real-world contexts. 
DO  - 10.21494/ISTE.OP.2024.1132 
JF  - Cognitive Engineering 
KW  - Anthropotechnical systems, Autonomy, Human factors, Human–autonomy team, Human-system collaboration, Human-system integration, Robotics, Team, Autonomie, Collaboration humain-système, Équipe, Équipe autonomie-humain, Facteurs humains, Intégration human-système, Robotique, Systèmes anthropotechniques,  
L1  - https://openscience.fr/IMG/pdf/iste_ingecog24v7n2_1.pdf 
LA  - en 
PB  - ISTE OpenScience 
DA  - 2024/03/18 
SN  - 2517-6978 
TT  - Human–Autonomy Teaming (HAT) – Équipe entre humain et autonomie : définitions, débats et orientations 
UR  - https://openscience.fr/Human-Autonomy-Teaming-Definitions-Debates-and-Directions 
IS  - Issue 2 
VL  - 7 
ER  -